Some Thoughts On Market Timing Part-1

This is the first in a series on what timing is, what it isn’t, and some right ways to do it. 

In recent days I have been experimenting with one of our proprietary indicators to expand its use. I named this indicator a “Risk Index” with the idea being when the indicator is high the risk are low and when the indicator is low the risks are high. As you can see in the chart below a higher percentage reading indicates a more favorable market and a lower reading indicates a less favorable market.

US Equity Risk Index

US Equity Risk Index

Our risk index is simply the percentage of out timing models that are bullish or bearish each week. For US equities we run 10 different models that look at trend, valuation, interest rates, inflation, sentiment, breadth, and intermarket relationships. I estimate that 53% of the individual components in the 10 models are equity trend based. There are a few reasons for this but the most important gets at the heart of timing. We use timing tools to help us first lower risk and in a distant second to increase returns. It turns out that trend following indicators while not a “Holy Grail” do a great job at keeping you in the big moves and minimizing your downside.

Our models come from many places. If you are familiar with Nelson Freeburg, Marty Zweig, and Ned Davis you would recognize a few of the models and would be able to see the inspiration in the other models.* Five of the 10 are straight from their material and the other five while homegrown take inspiration from their work. All the models have been backtested and while most of them slightly improve returns they all drastically improve drawdowns which is our primary goal.

So if each of these models is solid in its own right why would we take a consensus approach? There are several reasons but the two that stand out are that you never know when the market is going to change and invalidate a model. Now we can stand a prolonged period of under-performance but we cant handle a catastrophe.  If a model underperforms for a long enough period of time we would take it out if we could see that something had changed. As an example I once created a breadth based system that I was able to backtest and it generated low 20% returns with the worst drawdown being just over -7%. Well I got to use it for about a year before decimalization came and within weeks the results when to hell. I suspected something was off but it took a few more months to confirm it. I still update it and monitor it as it displays a certain segment of market behavior but its risk/reward is no longer favorable.

Of course most of the models in the risk index are based on weekly data and are longer term in nature. Still the risk is very real that something changes and some of them cease to be useful. By taking a consensus approach any downturn based on a degrading model can be minimized.

We are not going to get into the specifics of each model but instead how almost any model, in this case a consensus model, can be used. Don’t worry because in a future post we will go over how to build a simple but effective long term timing model.

So we have a US Equity model that is based on the buy/sell signals of 10 separate timing models. How can we use it? We could backtest it and see what readings give the best risk/reward and trade it that way but what inspired this post was the idea that we would just invest X% of a portfolio depending on the reading. If the model said that 50% of the models were on buy signals we would invest 50% of the portfolio and change it each time the buy signals percentage changed.  If that went well, it did, and sufficiently cut risk, it did, we could then experiment with different levels of leverage.

We did this with the data we had on hand and got the following results. Trading SPY-SP500 ETF, and using the total return series so that includes dividends, we got the following results. Buy and hold did fine on the upside but had a -50.77% drawdown. Timing trailed a bit on the upside but only suffered a -13.67% max drawdown. Finally by using a full 2X leverage we were able to cut buy and hold risk in half and increase returns by 1.89 times. In case you are wondering by using only 1.2X leverage you beat buy and hold by a few bucks but your max drawdown is still under -15%.

Risk Index SPY Returns and Drawdowns

Risk Index SPY Returns and Drawdowns

Looking at a chart of the equity curves for each of the strategies you can see how timing plus leverage killed buy and hold. Of course while max drawdown was far less the intermittent drawdowns were sometimes larger. Take 2011 for example when the market corrected just enough to turn the model down to 10% bullish only to rocket higher. That is the main risk to any system as you can get whipsawed in and out during a longer term trend. Of course anytime you are using leverage you can expect to have higher volatility at times as you are seeking higher returns.

Risk Index Equity Curves

Risk Index Equity Curves

Looking at the individual drawdown charts shows just how risky buy and hold is as the SPy-SP500 ETF was down over -50%. This of course requires a 100% return just to get back to breakeven.

Buy and Hold Drawdowns

Buy and Hold Drawdowns

Looking at the drawdowns for the timing without leverage equity curve you can see that while it has a lot of little drawdowns it has only had three double digit drawdowns since early 2008 with the worst one being -13.67%. It may have lagged in total return but not by much and as such would have been a lot easier to handle. Of course as we discussed one would only need 1.2X leverage to achieve equal returns with buy and hold with less than 1/3 the risk.

Timing Drawdowns

Timing Drawdowns

Finally we have the drawdown chart of the timing strategy but using 2X leverage. As you can see the worst drawdown was half of that of buy and hold. Of course the next two worst drawdowns also hit -20% in contrast to buy and hold which only had one more -20% drawdown. Still the overall risk has been cut in half and the returns almost doubled.

Timing Plus Leverage Drawdowns

Timing Plus Leverage Drawdowns


Why do we only have the risk index back to 4/11/08? We are working on extending it back a few decades but as we were building these we had some data limitations on two of our homegrown models. When we finish building them out we will share the results with our subscribers as well as the blog.  For now however we think that capturing most of the carnage of 2008 along with the correction of 2011 does a decent job of what can be accomplished with a good timing model and a few different ways to use it.

One aspect of this model that we like is that is gives a specific allocation percentage instead of just a buy/sell signal. This will be the purpose of a future post but if you go back and read all the Marty Zweig stuff, and Zweig was a timer if there ever was one, he never said to go all in or all out.

“How should you, the reader of this book, react to the constantly changing circumstances? Basically, I think you should shun the idea of buy-and-hold. I consider it a fallacious strategy. In the coming decade we are likely to see more bear markets and deeper ones. To lower risk, there will be periods when you should peel back your investments, in the stock and bond markets. It’s a matter of degree. You don’t have to go 100% to cash but you should cut back as risk rises and invest as risk recedes. I believe my market-timing methods in this book will help you do just that.”Marty Zweig from “Winning On Wall Street”

If you go read Howard Marks book “The Most Important Thing” you will find variations of the same concept. If you are a traditional value guy/gal your heart just skipped a beat as I said Howard Marks in the same post as “market timing”. The reality is that all active management has the same goal-minimize risk and maximize reward. Marks in his excellent book talks about assessing the range of future outcomes and  discusses risk throughout both his book and other writings. Despite different approaches both Marks and Zweig have the same goal. be aggressive when their indicators-be they book values or how much the ZUPI moved-say to be aggressive and back off when things look risky.

Happy Trading,

Take a $1 trial of The Macro Trader to receive unbiased actionable research


*I can’t write this and not give credit where credit is due. Nelson Freeburg the late publisher of Formula Research was a fantastic guy and his publication as well as correspondence has had a great influence on me. In fact while the idea of combining timing models together was not new, the way in which he did it elevated my thinking to a new level in his January 15, 1998 issue “The Power of a Composite Stock Market Model”. The components of my risk index are very different but if you read that report you can not help but see similarities.  Aside from that report however he put out more interesting and functional models than anyone I know of. If you can get a hold of any, or all, of them you will be better for it.






EWY South Korea ETF

One of our current positions is EWY the South Korean ETF. We went long a few weeks ago in our model portfolio based on the trend, valuation, and economic characteristics of South Korean stocks.

EWY-South Korea ETF


Another factor that got us into EWY was the increasing number of Asian countries that have been coming up in our global stock model. Our global stock model looks at technical, economic, fundamental, and sentiment indicators to help find foreign stock indexes that meet our risk to reward criteria.

Apparently we are not the only ones to have found an opportunity in South Korea as the Oracle himself WarrenB apparently is getting long some South Korean stocks as well.

In order to catch our trades in foreign stocks as well as other asset classes like US stocks, bonds, currencies, and commodities then sign up for a quarterly or annual subscription to The Macro Trader weekly newsletter with frequent intra-week updates.

Happy Trading,

XLY Consumer Discretionary ETF

Today’s post is short but as they say a picture is worth a thousand words, and sometimes even more. In our subscriber area we have a detailed analysis of the consumer and consumer related stocks. For everyone else, here is the chart of the consumer discretionary ETF and you are welcome to draw your own conclusions.

XLY-Consumer Discretionary ETF


Happy Trading,


Inches moisturizer with mirror children Color Women more? Hair generic viagra renews replacing I I recommended would.

If you are getting value out of our posts, you can do us a favor by linking to us with your site or blog and mentioning The Macro Trader to any of your friends that trade.

Our Basic Approach To Finding Investment Ideas

As you probably know Macro-Traders typically take a top-down approach when looking for potential investment ideas. Specifically we look for the best risk to reward opportunities we can across all asset classes, countries, and trading strategies. So we basically trade anything anywhere that we can find an edge.

Our investment approach takes a multi-step process to generate investments for our portfolios.

This is a flowchart showing our basic process.


Macro Flowchart

What follows is an explanation of each step.

We have two ways to come up with investment ideas. We have our quantitative methods and our traditional research. Our quantitative methods vary from all out trading models that give actual buy and sell signals to scanners that look for favorable conditions in different asset classes, to a few tools we have that just look for unusual activity. One of the best things about using quantitative tools is that we miss fewer opportunities due to a computer being able to scan more asset classes in more markets than we could ever do.

As much as technology helps us to catch things we wouldn’t otherwise find. We also rely heavily on traditional research. We are always reading magazines, newspapers, books, trade publications, research reports, etc. We read anything that might help us find new investment opportunities or more information for our current positions and themes. We also try to listen to smart people and watch news and other television that might help us find anything helpful. Basically we are information junkies.

Our next step after getting some investment ideas is to research them further to validate them. Most of the time we hit dead ends, but occasionally we come across something good. If we decide that it makes sense we start looking to see if there is a past model that goes with it. For instance as of this writing we are bullish emerging market telecom and have been for some time. When we first came across this theme we liked the idea because it was logical. So looking for a model we found VIP and MBT both Russian telecoms. They both had outstanding growth rates and the stocks were definitely outperforming the market. Well since then we have traded them and have found several other good telecoms riding that theme like TKC, TMX, TEF, and ETF.

After deciding that what we have found is a solid theme that works out fundamentally, we look at the risks and rewards. Risk management is the most important part of what we do. We look at risk on several levels. At the individual security level we look to see what the best instrument to trade, usually with security for m&A virtual data room are used by advisers and investors to set up a deal room for their clients quickly and allow them to remain in control of the documents they wish to share.. For instance if we are bullish on a country do we play it using equities, debt, or currency? We then look to see if we can cut off risk by using options. We like options for their flexibility. Many times we will find an idea that we like but due to the risk profile we can’t get in using the typical security, but we are able to manage the risk by using options. Another risk we really look at is portfolio risk. How does it correlate to our other positions, how does it correlate to the overall portfolio, are we actually just playing another version of a theme we already have on? We look at geographic, political, and any other type of risk we can. The final thing we look at is at what point do we admit that we are wrong? Or in other words where do we place our stop. Our stops are based off of the chart, volatility, potential reward, and size of our position. With risk there are not too many absolute rules. But one that we do always abide by is to never risk more than 2% of the portfolio on any position. Many times we will risk less but we will never risk more. So we size our positions accordingly.

Once all of this has been done we can finally add it to our portfolio. In future posts we will go into more depth on each part of this process. But this should give you an idea as to what we do and how we go about doing it.

Happy Trading,
The Macro Trader

P.S.-If you liked this then you will want to add our RSS feed and should consider subscribing to our newsletter

If you would like to receive our new FREE course “Macro Trading 101” put your e-mail in the box below.

Our Long Global ETF/Closed End Fund Watch List

As we have previously mentioned we run a Global Stock Model that essentially tries to be in the best countries. While we often trade ADR’s and have traded open ended mutual funds for the most part we trade the ETF’s. Occasionally that is not possible so if we can find a Closed End Fund that is correlated to the country index we will use that instead.

We keep a watch list of countries meeting our Stock and Interest Rate criteria and if they reach our entry prices we will buy them. We typically will only enter the top 5 on our list but depending on the geographic location of the countries, the macro-environment, valuation, and several other criteria we will buy other ones instead of or as well as the top 5. For a better idea of what goes into individual country criteria read this post on Singapore EWS.

We will go over our actual entries in greater depth in later posts. But essentially we look to buy in solid up-trends using breakouts and pullbacks. We are also addicted to risk management. If we can’t find a low risk entry we will wait. In our Newsletter we provide specific entries, exits, and stops for all of our positions. We don’t adhere to any profit target method but instead move our stops up as a position moves in our favor. We find this allows us to ride trends past where we “think” they should end while still using good risk management. As noted earlier we will cover a lot of this in later posts and cover it all in our Newsletter.

Back to the subject title here in order of geographic regions is our Long Global ETF/Closed End Fund watch list.

EWU-Great Britain ETF
EWU Great Britain United Kingdom ETF

EWQ- France ETF
EWQ France ETF

EWG-Germany ETF
EWG Germany ETF


EWL-Switzerland ETF
EWL Switzerland ETF

EWN-Netherlands ETF
EWN Netherlands ETF

VGK-Europe ETF

EWC-Canada ETF
EWC Canada ETF

EWH-Hong Kong ETF
EWH Hong Kong ETF

EWM Malaysia ETF

EWS-Singapore ETF
EWS Singapore ETF


RSX-Russia ETF
RSX Russia ETF

TKF-Turkey Closed End Fund
TKF Turkey Closed End Fund CEF

EWZ-Brazil ETF
EWZ Brazil ETF

If you have any questions, comments, ideas, etc. Feel free to contact us here.

Happy Trading,
The Macro Trader